Used Mitsubishi Colt Hatchback 1996 - 2004 review

Category: Small car

Build quality is definitely solid, but many of the Mitsubishi Colt's rivals are much better to drive

Mitsubishi Colt Hatchback (96 - 04)
  • Mitsubishi Colt Hatchback (96 - 04)
  • Mitsubishi Colt Hatchback (96 - 04)
Used Mitsubishi Colt Hatchback 1996 - 2004 review
Star rating
Author Avatar
by
Steve Huntingford
Published01 January 2006

What's the used Mitsubishi Colt hatchback like?

The Mitsubishi Colt is well made and it gets more kit than other similarly sized cars of the day. However, the fact that it's only available as a three-door limits its practicality. To make matters worse, the head- and legroom are tight in the back, and the boot is significantly smaller than some rivals', too.

It isn't a great car to drive, either. The lifeless steering ruins the handling, which is reasonable otherwise, and the gearchange feels too notchy. The ride can get really lumpy on some surfaces and neither engine is very punchy, or very refined.

Overview

Build quality is definitely solid, but many of the Mitsubishi Colt's rivals are much better to drive

  • It's cheap to buy and well made
  • The ride feels as lumpy as the gearchange

If you value style and solidity above all else, the Colt might be worth a look. But, if you also need comfort and practicality, there are much more suitable cars out there.

Ownership cost

What used Mitsubishi Colt hatchback will I get for my budget?

How much does it cost to run a Mitsubishi Colt hatchback?

You won't pay a fortune for the Colt - far from it, in fact. Although residual values weren't that bad when the car was new, the Colt is so old now that it will have lost most of its value. You'll be paying less than half the car's original cost even for the youngest examples.

That age also shows in fuel economy figures that are far from astounding. The 1.3 will return a respectable average of 40.9mpg, but the 1.6 should really do better than its 38.2mpg.

Our recommendations

Which used Mitsubishi Colt hatchback should I buy?

Two engines are available, and the 74bhp 1.3 is the best bet. It's cheaper to run than the 89bhp 1.6 and not that much slower.

At launch, both came with GLX trim, and this is the best trim to look out for. With the 1.3 engine, that ran to power steering, central locking and a driver's airbag, whereas 1.6 versions added an electric sunroof and electric front windows. The 1.6 was also available in Mirage spec, with alloys and a passenger airbag.

In 1999, a new entry-level GL trim was introduced, along with a new GLS range-topper to replace the Mirage. The GLS has alloys, air-con and anti-lock brakes.

The trims changed again in 2001. The 1.3 Classic was now the entry-level car, and came with power steering and twin front airbags. Equippe models got air-con, while the 1.6 version also got anti-lock brakes. The new 1.6 Elegance range-topper added alloys.

For all the latest reviews, advice and new car deals, sign up to the What Car? newsletter here

Alternatives

What alternatives should I consider to a used Mitsubishi Colt hatchback?