Used test: Abarth 595 vs Volkswagen Up GTI verdict
These two tiny tots both offer maximum bang for the buck, but which one makes more sense used? Read on to find out...
Our verdict
The Abarth 595 has been well beaten here. It may be quicker than the Up GTI, but it has too many flaws to overlook. We’d forgive its cramped rear and suspect driving position if it handled amazingly, but the faster you go, the less composed it becomes. It’s a shame because a bit more front-end grip, less intrusive traction control and better steering feel would make a big difference.
The Up GTI’s victory is a convincing one. Its extra practicality, comfier ride and better driving position, while not the most important things for a hot hatch, make it far more pleasant. And it combines them with precise steering and composed handling. On top of that, it’s slightly cheaper to buy and to run at this age. Just bear in mind that it’s not as effervescent as you might expect.
For all the latest reviews, advice and new car deals, sign up to the What Car? newsletter here
1st – Volkswagen Up GTI 1.0 TSI 115 3dr
For Better handling; comfier ride; more practical; cheaper to buy and run
Against Could be more exciting; intrusive traction control; contrived engine noise
What Car? rating 4 out of 5 stars
Read our full Volkswagen Up GTI used review >>
Find used Volkswagen Up GTI for sale>>
2nd – Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet 145
For Faster acceleration; more tuneful engine
Against Driving position; numb steering; limited front-end grip; more cramped rear seats
What Car? rating 3 out of 5 stars
Read our full Abarth 595 used review >>
Find used Abarth 595 for sale>>
Specifications: Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet 145
- Engine size 1.4-litre petrol
- Power 143bhp
- Torque 152lb ft
- 0-60mph 8.0sec
- Top speed 130mph
- Fuel economy 47.1mpg (Official average)
- CO2 emissions 139g/km
Specifications: Volkswagen Up GTI 1.0 TSI 115 3dr
- Engine size 1.0-litre petrol
- Power 113bhp
- Torque 147lb ft
- 0-60mph 8.8sec
- Top speed 122mph
- Fuel economy 58.9mpg (Official average)
- CO2 emissions 110g/km
<< Previous
Page 4 of 4