Caterham Seven review

Category: Sports car

Section: Costs & verdict

Star rating
Caterham Seven
Add to shortlist
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven
  • Caterham Seven

Costs & verdict

Everyday costs, plus how reliable and safe it is

Add up the value of all the parts and the Caterham Seven seems hideously expensive. You could buy a Ford Fiesta ST for considerably less cash than even cheapest Seven 160, for example – even before you’ve forked out extra to equip your Caterham with a roof and a windscreen.

But the Caterham Seven is a very different animal to a modern hot hatch. In fact, the Morgan 3-Wheeler is one of the only other new cars that’s similarly raw and unsophisticated, and that’s a much more expensive option.

What’s more, Caterhams hold onto their value better than the vast majority of modern cars, so you can bank on getting back a lot of your investment if you decide to sell. Building your Seven yourself is the cheapest option, but most buyers choose to pay a bit extra to have Caterham take care of that.

Chances are, you won’t be using your Caterham Seven for the daily commute, so fuel costs aren’t likely to be a big consideration, but the entry-level Seven 160 is official capable of nearly 58mpg. You won’t get anywhere near that if you regularly put your foot down, though.

Options worth adding include the aforementioned windscreen and all-weather kit (hood and doors), plus you’ll also want a heater and a 12-volt socket. The easiest way of adding all of this on our favourite 160 version is the optional ‘S’ pack.

For all the latest reviews, advice and new car deals, sign up to the What Car? newsletter here


Caterham Seven
Caterham Seven
Open Gallery5 Images


The Caterham Seven is unadulterated fun when the sun is shining and you’re on the right road. But it’s pricey, cramped and you really won’t want to have a crash

  • Raw, old-school driving experience
  • Slow depreciation
  • Incredible acceleration in most powerful versions
  • Expensive
  • Extremely cramped inside
  • You really won't want to hit anything

Also consider

Nissan 370Z

2010 - present

On paper the Nissan 370Z offers plenty of performance for a co...

Subaru WRX STI

2014 - present

Feels at least a decade old and is ridiculously expensive to r...

Mercedes E 63 AMG

2016 - present

Tremendously quick and amazing fun, thanks to its fabulou...

Audi TT RS

2018 - present

The Audi TT RS isn’t the sharpest driver’s car in the class, b...